Port St. Lucie Road Rage Crash on U.S. 1 Leaves Bystanders Caught in the Middle

This is one of the most worrisome crashes I’ve read about in recent weeks. A motorcycle and a pickup truck were in the middle of an ongoing road rage confrontation on U.S. Highway 1 in Port St. Lucie when the motorcycle ran a red light and hit a Chevrolet Silverado, throwing the rider from the bike. Moments later, the pickup driver followed through the same red light, hit the downed rider, and crashed head-on into a Toyota RAV4. Two vehicles that had nothing to do with the confrontation ended up in the middle of it anyway.

What’s unusual here isn’t just that someone ran a red light. It’s that both drivers did, in the middle of the same ongoing fight with each other. It certainly makes any claim related to this crash more complicated.

The Bystanders Have a Simple Case, Even Though This Crash Wasn’t Simple

The Silverado driver and the two people in the Toyota appear to have had no part in the confrontation at all. That matters a great deal, because it puts them in about as clean a position as an injured person can be in. Whatever gets sorted out about exactly how the motorcyclist and the pickup driver’s actions stack up against each other, neither bystander did anything wrong here in my opinion, and that isn’t likely to change. Sorting out exactly how much each of the two other drivers contributed to what happened is a real, complicated question. Whether the bystanders themselves did anything to deserve less than a full recovery isn’t.

The Motorcyclist Isn’t in the Same Position as the Bystanders

There’s an important difference buried in this crash. The motorcyclist was a participant in the ongoing confrontation, and he ran the first red light. That doesn’t erase whatever claim he has for what happened to him afterward, but it does mean his own conduct is fair game to be weighed against him in a way that the two bystanders’ conduct simply isn’t. Two people can come out of the same chain of events in very different legal positions, depending on whether they were part of what started it or simply happened to be driving nearby when it finally landed.

Reckless Driving Alone Can Support More Than Ordinary Damages

One more thing worth knowing, since there’s no indication of impairment here. Florida law doesn’t require alcohol or drugs to be involved for a case to go beyond ordinary compensation for medical bills and other losses. What it requires is clear and convincing evidence that someone’s conduct was intentional or showed a serious, reckless disregard for others’ safety, and deliberately driving through a red light in the middle of an active confrontation, right after watching someone get thrown from a motorcycle, is the kind of conduct that standard exists for. There’s still generally a cap on how much a jury can award for that kind of harm, typically three times the ordinary damages or $500,000, since the rule that removes that cap entirely is specific to cases involving drugs or alcohol. But being capped is very different from being unavailable.

Disclaimer

This article is for general informational purposes only, reflects the author’s personal opinion based on public reporting, and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. The facts presented may be incomplete or change as any investigation proceeds.